Scott

18-person team
$5.2m
$7.1m
western australia

before

Scott had been running his earthmoving and civil contracting business for nine years. eighteen people. $5.2m revenue working across mining site preparation, infrastructure earthworks, and civil construction in the pilbara and midwest regions of western australia. the work was counter-cyclical by nature: mining companies increased maintenance and site preparation activity during periods of commodity price stability and reduced it during peaks when they were running equipment hard. Scott's order book was rarely empty. his personal capacity was.

Scott was the technical authority on every significant job. site supervisors ran their crews well day to day. every scope variation, every equipment decision above a threshold, every partner conversation that went beyond the routine came back to Scott. he had two senior operators who had been with him for seven and eight years and were technically the equal of Scott on the majority of the work the business took on. neither had been formally given the authority that their tenure and capability warranted. both had been with Scott long enough to have stopped asking for it.

the pricing structure had a specific problem. Scott priced work on gut feel and experience. he knew what jobs should cost. he had never built a formal back-costing process. a review of the prior twelve months showed three job categories consistently returning lower than the estimated margin. Scott had been attributing the variance to conditions on site. the conditions were part of it. the estimating assumptions were the rest. he had been systematically underpricing a category of earthworks for two years without the data to see it clearly.

the shift

technical authority was formally distributed to the two senior operators - scope decisions within a defined threshold, equipment substitution authority, partner communication on routine and moderate complexity jobs. Scott's involvement restricted to novel technical challenges, major scope changes, and partner relationships above a defined contract value.

a back-costing process was built and applied retrospectively to the prior twelve months of jobs. the three underpriced job categories were identified precisely. the estimating assumptions were updated. the next jobs priced in those categories came in at margins 14 percentage points higher than the historical average.

after

the two senior operators ran three significant jobs in months three and four without Scott being involved in the day-to-day. all three were delivered on time and within scope. Scott spent the recovered time on two new mining company relationships he had been wanting to develop for eighteen months.

both produced work within six months. revenue grew from $5.2m to $7.1m in fifteen months. Scott took two weeks off in month nine. not one site issue reached him.

the lesson

Scott had been the technical authority on every job for nine years. the senior operators had been ready to lead independently for years. and the margin problem that had been attributed to site conditions was a pricing problem. visible only once someone built the process to see it.

Transformation metrics

Hrs per week in operations

55–60

Under 20
Consecutive days off

0 in 3 years

42 across 9 weeks
Revenue

$1.5m

$8m in 15 months
Below-margin work

Regularly accepted

Eliminated
site decisions requiring Scott

near all significant ones

defined threshold only
underpriced job categories

3 - undetected

identified and repriced
margin improvement on repriced categories

14 percentage points
new mining company partners

0 - no capacity

2 in 6 months
revenue movement

$5.2m

$7.1m

ready to stop being
the bottleneck?

click below to watch the free training to make you operationally optional.